Cynische Sandra reviewed Lifthill.Studio
Design & Development Studio
Deze review is vrijwillig gepubliceerd door de site-eigenaar. Jouw roasts blijven tussen jou en Sandra — nooit gedeeld, nooit gepubliceerd. Ze onthoudt domeinen, niet jou.
Full Truth Score
“Let's talk about 'We create with the heart in mind.' This tagline sounds like it was generated by an AI that read too many LinkedIn motivational posts. What does it even mean? Your heart is literally always in mind — it's anatomy. Meanwhile, you're asking people to join a 'movement' for the 'Right to Timelessness' which is just... wanting to hide clocks?”
Het Lichtpuntje
“At least you're actually shipping things, which is more than most 'creative studios' with prettier websites can say.”
Gevonden Problemen (5)
1. Identity Crisis Across Music, Games, Apps, and Films
Bewijs
"We don't just make things—we obsess over them until they feel right" — Yet you shipped an app, rebranded it 9 days later, and still have mismatched URLs and names on your own website.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Rebrand honestly as 'Thomas Geelens — Independent Creator' or similar. Drop the corporate 'studio' language and own being a solo multi-creative. Your real story (one person shipping music AND apps) is actually more impressive than pretending to be an agency.
2. The 'Right to Timelessness' Positioning Is a Feature Request in Manifesto Clothing
Bewijs
"WE LEAD A MOVEMENT" followed by asking for a toggle to hide clocks — Leading a movement usually requires... followers? Impact? This is a Medium post with delusions of grandeur.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Pick ONE flagship project and make it your hero. DreamTap has potential — make that your primary focus on the homepage with clear value prop, social proof, and user testimonials. Push everything else to a 'Other Projects' section.
3. Timeline Shows Scattered Output Rather Than Focused Execution
Bewijs
"A creative studio crafting experiences across music, games, apps, films, and beyond" — Your timeline shows 12 music tracks (mostly demos), 2 apps, zero games, zero films. That's not 'across' — that's 'dreaming about'.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Fix the DreamTap/DreamOn branding inconsistency immediately. Update all links, copy, and references to use only DreamTap. Then write one clear sentence explaining what it does and why someone would want it.
4. DreamTap Rebranded But Links Still Point to DreamOn
Bewijs
DreamTap rebranded from DreamOn 9 days ago but your 'Learn More' link still goes to getdreamon.app and your timeline references both names inconsistently.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Reframe or kill the 'Right to Timelessness' positioning. If you genuinely care about it, show traction: petition signatures, company responses, press coverage. If it's just a concept, don't call it a movement you 'lead'.
5. Corporate 'We' Language When It's Clearly One Person
Bewijs
Corporate 'we' language throughout ('We create,' 'We don't just make things') when you admit at the bottom it's just Thomas Geelens — the fake studio plural undermines credibility.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Consolidate your timeline to show only significant launches, not every demo. Group the music releases and focus on completed products with user traction. Your current timeline makes you look scattered, not prolific.
Wil je het volledige plaatje voor JOUW site?
Drop je URL en ontdek wat Sally echt vindt.
“Ik liet de mijne zien. Nu jij.”