Cynische Sandra reviewed RightToTimelessness.com
Advocacy & Cause Website
Deze review is vrijwillig gepubliceerd door de site-eigenaar. Jouw roasts blijven tussen jou en Sandra — nooit gedeeld, nooit gepubliceerd. Ze onthoudt domeinen, niet jou.
Full Truth Score
“The "Founding Phase" badge with 37 supporters is doing SO much heavy lifting here. "Be one of the first 100. Your name will be remembered." Remembered by whom? The other 99 people who also really hate looking at their status bar? You've got milestone unlocks like it's a Kickstarter for basic advocacy actions you could already do today.”
Het Lichtpuntje
“The graphic design is clean and the multilingual support shows someone actually put effort into the presentation, even if the premise is absurd.”
Gevonden Problemen (5)
1. Fundamental Misunderstanding of Existing Features
Bewijs
"Be one of the first 100. Your name will be remembered." — Remembered in the footnotes of digital activism cringe compilations. You have 37 people. This isn't Selma, it's a feature request.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Reframe as a UX improvement suggestion, not a human rights movement. Drop the manifesto language and approach this as 'standardizing clock visibility options across platforms' with a focus on actual accessibility benefits backed by real medical advocacy.
2. Scientific Evidence Misrepresentation
Bewijs
"67% of people regularly experience 'time stress'" — This APA stat is about work hours, childcare, and economic pressure. You're using sociology research about capitalism to argue for hiding your iPhone clock. That's not scholarship, that's sophistry.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Do actual research on existing solutions and partner with them. Create comprehensive guides showing all CURRENT ways to hide/customize clocks, then use data on adoption barriers to make a specific case for native system-level implementation.
3. Manufactured Urgency With Only 37 Supporters
Bewijs
"Can't Hide the Clock on Your Device? Millions search every month" — Cool SEO strategy, but the guides admit many platforms DO allow this. So which is it — impossible or just inconvenient?
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Build a real community before claiming movement status. Create a Discord/forum where people share actual experiences with time anxiety, document use cases, and develop evidence-based proposals to submit to platform accessibility teams.
4. False Victimhood Framing
Bewijs
"The clock doesn't help you. It haunts you" and "Your device, their rules" treats a design choice as digital oppression, trivializing actual autonomy and accessibility issues.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Tone down the oppression language. Focus on practical UX arguments: reduced cognitive load, accessibility for ADHD users, photosensitivity considerations. These are real arguments that don't require pretending a clock is oppression.
5. Solutions Already Exist But Are Ignored
Bewijs
The platform guides claim hiding clocks is 'impossible' on most devices, but Windows has had taskbar clock hiding since the 90s, and gaming consoles display games fullscreen anyway.
Aanbevolen Oplossing
Acknowledge existing solutions and position as 'we want this to be easier and more universal.' Honesty about what already works makes the case for what doesn't work yet much more credible.
Wil je het volledige plaatje voor JOUW site?
Drop je URL en ontdek wat Sally echt vindt.
“Ik liet de mijne zien. Nu jij.”