๐ŸŽฌ Movie Review

Twenty Years Later, Miranda Priestly Returns to Save Print Media, Which Tells You Exactly How the Movie Ends

Directed by David Frankel ยท Meryl Streep, Anne Hathaway, Emily Blunt

Comedy ยท 2026-05-01

โ€œGorgeous, expensive and comforting, like a glass of champagne someone opened yesterday.โ€

6.0/ 10
Cynical Sally reviews the movies

The Devil Wears Prada 2 knows exactly what it is, and so do the six hundred and eighty eight million dollars it made. Two decades on, Andy Sachs is a respected New York reporter whose entire newsroom gets laid off by text message during an awards gala, while Miranda Priestly is under fire for a puff piece about a brand that turned out to use sweatshop labor. To fix Runway's credibility, Irv Ravitz hires Andy as features editor without Miranda's blessing, and the claws come back out. It is a nostalgia machine with immaculate tailoring.

The cast is why it works at all. Streep, Hathaway, Blunt and Tucci slip back into these people like a favorite coat, joined by Justin Theroux, Lucy Liu and Kenneth Branagh, and for long stretches you are happy just to watch them share a frame. Blunt in particular is a delight. The reviews landed generally positive but mixed, and one critic nailed the flaw: the film gives you a lot to look at, but it is flat champagne. Beautiful, bubbly on the surface, a little airless underneath.

So Sally will not sneer at a fun, handsome, genuinely enjoyable crowd-pleaser, especially one that opened to two hundred and thirty three million dollars worldwide and sent seventy six percent female audiences home grading it an A-minus. But a legacy sequel about saving print media in 2026 is a fantasy dressed as a comeback, and the movie is at its best when it stops pretending to have new things to say and just lets these actors be magnetic. Which, thankfully, is most of the time.

Share the roastTap a card to grab it
Sally roast card 1
PNG
Sally roast card 2
PNG
Sally roast card 3
PNG
What it nails
  • 01

    Streep, Hathaway, Blunt and Tucci reprising their roles with the chemistry fully intact.

  • 02

    Emily Blunt in particular is a highlight, stealing scenes with ease.

  • 03

    A polished, luxurious look that makes the fashion world feel aspirational again.

  • 04

    A crowd-pleasing hit, grossing six hundred and eighty eight million dollars and an A-minus CinemaScore.

What it botches
  • 01

    A plot one critic memorably called flat champagne: lovely to look at, airless underneath.

  • 02

    The premise of saving print media in 2026 is nostalgia posing as stakes.

  • 03

    New cast additions get less to do than the returning stars they orbit.

  • 04

    It leans on affection for the original rather than earning fresh emotional ground.

Who it's for

Fans of the original who want to spend two more hours with these characters, and anyone who likes their comfort food beautifully plated.

Who should skip

Viewers hoping a sequel would say something new about media or fashion rather than restage the first film in nicer clothes.

The marketing roast

The campaign sold the reunion, the outfits and that one raised Streep eyebrow, and honestly, why wouldn't it. Nobody bought a ticket for a searing take on the collapse of journalism. They bought it for Miranda Priestly walking back into a room, and the marketing was smart enough to give the people exactly, and only, that.

Your turn

Your website, CV, or whatever you made. I'll roast that too.

A full teardown from โ‚ฌ2,99. No mercy.

Printed with disdain ยท Cynical Sally