Bittere Brigitte reviewed RightToTimelessness.com
Advocacy & Cause Website
Diese Bewertung wurde freiwillig vom Website-Inhaber veröffentlicht. Deine Roasts bleiben zwischen dir und Brigitte — nie geteilt, nie veröffentlicht. Sie merkt sich Domains, nicht dich.
Full Truth Bewertung
“The "Founding Phase" badge with 37 supporters is doing SO much heavy lifting here. "Be one of the first 100. Your name will be remembered." Remembered by whom? The other 99 people who also really hate looking at their status bar? You've got milestone unlocks like it's a Kickstarter for basic advocacy actions you could already do today.”
Die Gute Seite
“The graphic design is clean and the multilingual support shows someone actually put effort into the presentation, even if the premise is absurd.”
Gefundene Probleme (5)
1. Fundamental Misunderstanding of Existing Features
Beweis
"Be one of the first 100. Your name will be remembered." — Remembered in the footnotes of digital activism cringe compilations. You have 37 people. This isn't Selma, it's a feature request.
Empfohlene Lösung
Reframe as a UX improvement suggestion, not a human rights movement. Drop the manifesto language and approach this as 'standardizing clock visibility options across platforms' with a focus on actual accessibility benefits backed by real medical advocacy.
2. Scientific Evidence Misrepresentation
Beweis
"67% of people regularly experience 'time stress'" — This APA stat is about work hours, childcare, and economic pressure. You're using sociology research about capitalism to argue for hiding your iPhone clock. That's not scholarship, that's sophistry.
Empfohlene Lösung
Do actual research on existing solutions and partner with them. Create comprehensive guides showing all CURRENT ways to hide/customize clocks, then use data on adoption barriers to make a specific case for native system-level implementation.
3. Manufactured Urgency With Only 37 Supporters
Beweis
"Can't Hide the Clock on Your Device? Millions search every month" — Cool SEO strategy, but the guides admit many platforms DO allow this. So which is it — impossible or just inconvenient?
Empfohlene Lösung
Build a real community before claiming movement status. Create a Discord/forum where people share actual experiences with time anxiety, document use cases, and develop evidence-based proposals to submit to platform accessibility teams.
4. False Victimhood Framing
Beweis
"The clock doesn't help you. It haunts you" and "Your device, their rules" treats a design choice as digital oppression, trivializing actual autonomy and accessibility issues.
Empfohlene Lösung
Tone down the oppression language. Focus on practical UX arguments: reduced cognitive load, accessibility for ADHD users, photosensitivity considerations. These are real arguments that don't require pretending a clock is oppression.
5. Solutions Already Exist But Are Ignored
Beweis
The platform guides claim hiding clocks is 'impossible' on most devices, but Windows has had taskbar clock hiding since the 90s, and gaming consoles display games fullscreen anyway.
Empfohlene Lösung
Acknowledge existing solutions and position as 'we want this to be easier and more universal.' Honesty about what already works makes the case for what doesn't work yet much more credible.
Willst du das vollständige Bild für DEINE Seite?
Gib deine URL ein und finde heraus, was Sally wirklich denkt.
“Ich hab dir meins gezeigt. Jetzt du.”